Why You Are Losing at Pot-Limit Omaha With Ryan Laplante
11 October 2018
PokerBrave (471 articles)
Share

Not long after the “poker boom” of the mid-2000s created untold numbers of new poker players, many of whom got their introduction to the game by playing poker online, those who began with no-limit hold’em began gravitating toward other variants in search of new challenges and added action.

For many of these players, pot-limit Omaha was a first option, with PLO fast becoming many players’ second favorite poker game to play — or even their favourite.

Nicknamed soon after its introduction back in the 1980s as “the action game,” pot-limit Omaha encourages action for multiple reasons. For one, the pot-limit betting format enables more postflop play than is the case in no-limit hold’em, including (in some games) more multi-way pots.

Also, many players — especially new or “recreational” PLO players — are seduced by the fact that being dealt four cards from which they choose two to make a hand, every PLO hand seems somehow playable, both before the flop and (if the hand connects) after the flop. That, too, obviously adds more “action” to the game.

However, as poker pro Ryan Laplante points out in the video below, that’s not really how winning PLO players approach the game.

Laplante has over $1.7 million in lifetime tournament earnings, highlighted by a World Series of Poker bracelet won in 2016 in a PLO event. Here he quickly highlights several mistakes he sees recreational PLO players making, including…

  • underappreciating the value of a wrap, which Laplante notes can be “as good or better than flopping top set”
  • overvaluing wraps when a flush is possible or the board is paired
  • overvaluing the “bare nuts” — that is, having the current nuts but being unable to improve by redrawing to a better hand
  • overvaluing top two pair (which Laplante likens to top pair, weak kicker in hold’em)

The theme running through Laplante’s advice is for players to use more caution in PLO than many typically do.

“People see four cards, see that they hit the board, and they just want to get it in,” Laplante observes. However, in truth, PLO is more of a “nitty, boring, slow game” when played by knowledgeable players. Take a look: